290 A. Soylu et al. / TheyBuyForYou platform and knowledge graph
[3] L. Akoglu, H. Tong and D. Koutra, Graph based anomaly detection and description: A survey, Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery
29(3) (2015), 626–688. doi:10.1007/s10618-014-0365-y.
[4] J.M. Alvarez-Rodríguez et al., New trends on e-Procurement applying semantic technologies, Computers in Industry 65(5) (2014), 797–799.
doi:10.1016/j.compind.2014.04.002.
[5] C. Badenes-Olmedo et al., Scalable cross-lingual similarity through language-specific concept hierarchies, in: Proc. of K-CAP 2019,ACM,
2019, pp. 147–153. doi:10.1145/3360901.3364444.
[6] S.K. Bansal and S. Kagemann, Integrating big data: A semantic extract-transform-load framework, Computer 48(3) (2015), 42–50. doi:10.
1109/MC.2015.76.
[7] M. Bennett, The financial industry business ontology: Best practice for big data, Journal of Banking Regulation 14(3) (2013), 255–268.
doi:10.1057/jbr.2013.13.
[8] R.A. Berk, Statistical Learning from a Regression Perspective, Springer, 2020. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-40189-4.
[9] V. Chandola et al., Anomaly detection: A survey, ACM Computing Surveys 41(3) (2009). doi:10.1145/1541880.1541882.
[10] X. Cheng et al., BTM: Topic modeling over short texts, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 26(12) (2014), 2928–2941.
doi:10.1109/TKDE.2014.2313872.
[11] E.H. Chi, Technical perspective: Humans and computers working together on hard tasks, Communications of the ACM 60(9) (2017), 92.
doi:10.1145/3068614.
[12] O. Corcho et al., Ontological engineering: Principles, methods, tools and languages, in: Ontologies for Software Engineering and Software
Technology, C. Calero, F. Ruiz and M. Piattini, eds, Springer, 2006, pp. 1–48.
[13] E. Daga et al., A BASILar approach for building web APIs on top of SPARQL endpoints, in: Proc. of SALAD 2015, CEUR-WS.org, 2015,
http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1359/paper4.pdf.
[14] I. Distinto et al., LOTED2: An ontology of European public procurement notices, Semantic Web 7(3) (2016), 267–293. doi:10.3233/SW-
140151.
[15] P. Espinoza-Arias et al., The Zaragoza’s knowledge graph: Open data to harness the city knowledge, Information 11(3) (2020). doi:10.
3390/info11030129.
[16] G. Futia et al., Removing barriers to transparency: A case study on the use of semantic technologies to tackle procurement data inconsis-
tency, in: Proc. of ESWC 2017, Springer, 2017, pp. 623–637. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-58068-5_38.
[17] M. Giese et al., Optique: Zooming in on big data, Computer 48(3) (2015), 60–67. doi:10.1109/MC.2015.82.
[18] P. Harrington, Machine Learning in Action, Manning Publications Co., 2012.
[19] P. Hitzler, A review of the semantic web field, Communications of the ACM 64
(2) (2021), 76–83. doi:10.1145/3397512.
[20] M. Janssen et al., Driving public sector innovation using big and open linked data (BOLD), Information Systems Frontiers 19(2) (2017),
189–195. doi:10.1007/s10796-017-9746-2.
[21] R. Kosara, An argument structure for data stories, in: Proc. of EuroVis 2017, 2017, pp. 31–35. doi:10.2312/eurovisshort.20171129.
[22] A. Meroño-Peñuela et al., grlc makes GitHub taste like linked data APIs, in: Proc. of ESWC 2016, Springer, 2016, pp. 342–353. doi:10.
1007/978-3-319-47602-5_48.
[23] M. Miroslav et al., Semantic technologies on the mission: Preventing corruption in public procurement, Computers in Industry 65(5) (2014),
878–890. doi:10.1016/j.compind.2014.02.003.
[24] J. Muñoz-Soro et al., PPROC, an ontology for transparency in public procurement, Semantic Web 7(3) (2016), 295–309. doi:10.3233/SW-
150195.
[25] M. Ne
ˇ
caský et al., Linked data support for filing public contracts, Computers in Industry 65(5) (2014), 862–877. doi:10.1016/j.compind.
2013.12.006.
[26] N.F. Noy and D.L. McGuinness, Ontology development 101: A guide to creating your first ontology, Technical Report, Stanford Medical
Informatics, 2001.
[27] OECD principles for integrity in public procurement, 2009, Technical Report, OECD, http://www.oecd.org/gov/ethics/48994520.pdf.
[28] J.M.Á. Rodríguez et al., Towards a pan-European E-procurement platform to aggregate, publish and search public procurement notices
powered by linked open data: The moldeas approach, International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering 22(3)
(2012), 365–384. doi:10.1142/S0218194012400086.
[29] D. Roman et al., A bird’s-eye view of euBusinessGraph: A business knowledge graph for company data, in: Proc. of the ISWC 2020 Posters,
Demos, and Industry Tracks, CEUR-WS.org, 2020, http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2721/paper493.pdf.
[30] D. Roman et al., The euBusinessGraph ontology: A lightweight ontology for harmonizing basic company information, Semantic Web,in
press (2021). doi:10.3233/SW-210424.
[31] E. Simperl et al., Towards a knowledge graph based platform for public procurement, in: Proc. of MTSR 2018, Springer, 2018, pp. 317–323.
doi:10.1007/978-3-030-14401-2_29.
[32] A. Soylu et al., Towards integrating public procurement data into a semantic knowledge graph, in: Proc. of EKAW 2018 Poster and Demon-
strations, CEUR-WS.org, 2018, http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2262/ekaw-poster-01.pdf.
[33] A. Soylu et al., OptiqueVQS: A visual query system over ontologies for industry, Semantic Web 9(5) (2018), 627–660. doi:10.3233/SW-
180293.
[34] A. Soylu et al., An overview of the TBFY knowledge graph for public procurement, in: Proc. of ISWC 2019 Satellite Tracks,CEUR-WS.org,
2019, http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2456/paper14.pdf.
[35] A. Soylu et al., Towards an ontology for public procurement based on the open contracting data standard, in: Proc. of I3E 2019, Springer,
2019, pp. 230–237. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-29374-1_19.